Opinion
Constructive health care meetings never more important
Our view: Voters who want to vent about various reform plans can take it outside. The rest of us want to hear what Ann Kirkpatrick has to say and give her direct feedback.So let's see if we have this straight:
-- Congress, reacting to concerns that it is rushing through a major health care reform bill without direct input from voters, holds off on a vote until after Labor Day so members can go back to their constituents to sound them out on various plans. -- When members attempt to hold meetings to explain the options and get feedback, some are shouted down by the same constituents who accused them of failing to consult with voters.
Maybe we're missing something here, but since when did town hall meetings become platforms for shouts and chants that make a discussion impossible? Protest rallies have their place, but it is outside on the lawn of City Hall, not inside where constructive dialogue is supposed to be taking place.
We acknowledge that some folks are anxious about proposed changes they see as harmful to a U.S. health care system they believe serves them well. And we suppose that if you are in good health and like your current insurance plan, you might not have much need for health reform.
But many others have no insurance at all, and even those who do often face gaps in coverage, high deductibles and soaring premiums. Numerous studies point to U.S. health care costs in a generation that are simply unaffordable without major changes in the system.
In Congress, Democrats and Republicans alike have acknowledged the need for substantive change and they have come up with alternatives. They've commissioned studies and consulted experts. The Congressional Budget Office has weighed in on future costs. Several draft bills have been voted on by committees and their texts widely circulated.
What's disappointing is how much misinformation has been spread by interests with political and financial axes to grind, and -- thanks to the Internet -- how fast. From euthanasia to banning of private insurance to covering all illegal immigrants, the distortions have been reckless by political leaders and talk show hosts who should know better. We urge readers to consult www.factcheck.org for the latest updates on the rumor mill.
That said, how should members of Congress check in with constituents on this important issue? The first step would be to have a Web site that explains the various bills, addresses the rumors and lays out where the member stands on various aspects and what issues are still unresolved in her mind.
Unfortunately, as of Monday, U.S. Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick's site does none of the above. It simply links to the text of a very complicated House bill and promises more will be posted later. It provides no basis for constituents to evaluate the competing measures nor where Kirkpatrick stands on them.
If that isn't frustrating enough for constituents who want some interaction with their congressperson, Kirkpatrick's public schedule calls only for "Chats with Ann" that appear to be one-on-one meetings. On health care, all she has done so far is hold a one-hour teleconference, and the transcript of that session has not yet been released.
We urge Kirkpatrick to comment and get constituent feedback on the various aspects of the health care reform bills currently in play, including whether:
-- Employers should be required to offer health insurance to employees. If not all employers, which ones?
-- A public insurance program should be set up if employers are allowed to opt out of offering health coverage to their employees
-- Those people currently uninsured should be required to purchase insurance on a sliding scale
-- The tax-exemption on premiums for workplace health insurance should be reduced or eliminated to help pay for the expansion of the system.
-- Doctors should be paid on a case basis, not for each procedure involved in treating a case.
-- Extensive data collection and analysis should determine the most cost-effective treatment methods.
If Kirkpatrick does not want to be accused of controlling the agenda at town hall meetings and thus becoming the target of hecklers, perhaps a moderator should run the discussions. Neutral groups like the League of Women Voters and the AAUW are ideal for setting ground rules and defusing the tension that surrounds controversial issues.
Time, however, is running out -- August will be over before we know it. Kirkpatrick owes her 1st District constituents more than disembodied teleconferences and one-on-one chats at supermarkets. We urge her to set up town hall meetings on health care reform, and we urge voters to respect a format that promotes spirited but constructive discussion.
»Subscribe to the Arizona Daily Sun
Ads by Yahoo!
Super Cheap Car Insurance
Get Discount Car Insurance Quotes Online – Rates from $15 / Month.
Discount-Car-Insurance-Rates.com
Readers' Favorites
-
H1N1 vaccines now for wider population
(15 ratings)
-
Two GOP lawmakers halt budget process
(15 ratings)
-
Food banks burdened by high demand in sour economy
(15 ratings)
-
Palin savors a fine whine
(52 ratings)
-
School closures, teacher layoffs on fast track
(51 ratings)
Most commented stories
- FUSD mulls high school closures (62)
- Army: 12 dead, 31 hurt in attack at Fort Hood (54)
- Kirkpatrick to vote 'yes' on health care bill (51)
- Canyon camping reservations due changes (47)
- Labor pains at City Hall (45)
- Sledding proposal collapses (41)
- Unions for city OK'd (40)
- Snowbowl construction still in limbo (39)
- Few churches take up homeless cause (38)
- Due process being ignored in handling of Snowbowl's permit (36)
Leave your comments below:
Just Me wrote on Aug 13, 2009 3:26 PM:
" You're a gem, Matthew. I notice you won't address who funds your little groups. Could it be that you like being misled so long as it's conservatives doing it? "
I noticed that you won't address the same issue in my post. Rather than reply to my comments you went off on a rambling tangent, but apparently couldn't respond to any of the facts I posted. Could it be that you like being misled so long as it's liberals doing it?
Please don't call me a conservative, I'm not. Over 30 years ago I came to the realization that government is not operating in my best interest, but in the governments own interest. I just like to point out the hypocrisy of people like you. My personal opinion is that the Federal Government needs to follow the Constitution, which they haven't done for a long time.
You've pulled the race card and you continue calling names, but you still didn't respond to even one point that I made. As a matter of fact I've noticed that you've not responded to most of the comments directed at you, but you've done an excellent job calling everybody names in your long winded diatribes. What was that you were saying about discussion skills? Please don't pretend to respond to my post. I'd be better off talking to a brick wall that trying to have a reasonable discussion with you. BuhBye!
HotCoffee wrote on Aug 13, 2009 12:50 PM:
Good job ignoring every point I raised in my post and going off on a tangent. I didn't think you would have a logical response to my points, and apparently I was correct. All I saw in your reply was name calling and accusations.
Only second to playing the race cars to prove your "
HotCoffee wrote on Aug 13, 2009 12:50 PM:
You guys kept wantting discussion. And once you got that, you show up at these townhalls and shout down the senators and congresspeople that are trying to speak, thus stifling discussion. Yeah, great discussion skills there! Shouting, screaming, yeah, that's real great discussion. "
Just Me wrote on Aug 13, 2009 12:08 PM:
" Well, JustMe, you seem to have forgotten that these conservative groups, like the ones I cited, are getting funding from the medical insurance industry and others.
Well, HotCoffee, you seem to have forgotten that these liberal mobs, like ACORN and others are getting funding from, well, me and other taxpayers who happen to object to the Federal Government shoving this down our throats.
Why is it that you have a problem with people and groups who have a stake in this spending their OWN money to protest this massive taxpayer ripoff, yet you have no problem with the Federal Government funneling tax dollars to liberal groups in a not-so-transparent attempt to pretend that the general population supports this massive fraud.
I suspect that many people, like me, aren't against health care reform. We just don't want it shoved down our throats. This problem has been going on for decades, so any reasonable person would probably agree that that we should take few months to discuss the issues and get things right the first time. But some people are determined that it has to happen RIGHT now, with no discussion. What doesn't the Government want people to know that they're in such a hurry to pass this?
I won't respond to the rest of your post. Once you pull the race card you've admitted that you have nothing to offer to the conversation. Thanks for pretending to be a rational person, but your writing proves otherwise. "
HotCoffee wrote on Aug 13, 2009 11:08 AM:
Great wrote on Aug 12, 2009 10:56 PM:
HotCoffee wrote on Aug 12, 2009 7:12 PM:
But, hey, it's only about poor people getting medical care. I suspect that among some conservatives---not all, but some---the constant cry of "illegal aliens will get it!" gives us a window into the motivations of some. I suspect some are motivated by a type of racism. The thought that "Mexicans" will get free health care. Because, really, you see the complaints about sealing the border South, but no worries about other illegal immigrants. Well, excepting Arabs, of course. Then there's the thinking among some that free health care for the poor means it's for certain minorities, which doesn't sit well with certain Far Right people who have obviously attached themselves to this movement. After all, a Georgia congressman just had a swastika painted on his office after a townwhall debate. I also suspect that all this "Obama wasn't born here!" is also racially motivated. And the thinking that a black president automatically means whites are threatened is also present. All this "Obama is a racist" nonsense when, in reality, it is some conservatives---not all, but some---preaching racial bigotry, though in a subtle fashion. Ok, well the swastika wasn't so subtle. Just sayin'... "
Matthew Quigley wrote on Aug 12, 2009 6:22 PM:
Java boy, Take some time to read the bill. Then perhaps you'll be able to make a positive contribution to the discussion. "
Just Me wrote on Aug 12, 2009 4:57 PM:
Why is that a problem? The Democrats and groups like ACORN have been doing this for years. You wouldn't be one of those hypocrites I keep hearing about would you? Here's a few current examples.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=169x9027
http://gomyd.com/2009/06/22/healthcare-rally-in-dc-on-thursday-625-free-buses-free-lunch/
http://beavercountyblue.org/2009/07/21/bus-trip-to-dc-july-30th-rally-and-lobby-for-single-payer-healthcare/
http://www.democrats.com/node/19877
http://unionsforsinglepayerhr676.org/news_releases/2009-07-20 "
HotCoffee wrote on Aug 12, 2009 11:10 AM:
Conservatives for Patients' Rights is run by Rick Scott, who used to be the honcho of Columbia/HCA which is a for-profit hospital chain. It seems the freedom-loving Mr. Scott was forced to resign in the middle of a fraud investigation. Columbia/HCA eventually pled guilty to charges of overbilling state and federal health plans. They paid $1.7 billion in fines. Oh, what's that? Can it be, dare I say it, that these townhall mobs might be sheep, Matt?
And look what I found, Matt, on FreedomWorks own site:
http://www.freedomworks.org/press-releases/freedomworks-opposes-asbestos-trust-fund-bill
FreedomWorks opposes creating a fund to healp victims of asbestos exposure. Have ou ever seen someone with lungs ravaged by asbestos exposure, Matthew? I have. It would seem that FreedomWorks wishes to enshrine the freedoms of corporations to continue exposing workers to asbestos. Gosh, and look here:
http://www.redherring.com/Home/pages/print/posts/?bid=7c885b70-f74d-478d-9cd3-46258788ce50&mode=Full
Wow! Seems FreedomWorks is for sale, Matt! What was that you said...sheep, was it? And would ya look at this:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/22/AR2006072200683.html
Man, I can't believe it! A fine, freedom-loving group like FreedomWorks out to fleece the, er, sheep?
Well, Matt, look, I know we all don't have inquisitive minds seeking the truth. Lots of people believe whatever they're told. So, you might wish to rethink your use of the word "sheep". "
HotCoffee wrote on Aug 12, 2009 10:33 AM:
Matthew Quigley wrote on Aug 12, 2009 5:37 AM:
Kirkpatrick supporter wrote on Aug 11, 2009 4:46 PM:
Flag Lifer wrote on Aug 11, 2009 3:30 PM:
HotCoffee wrote on Aug 11, 2009 3:02 PM:
Online editor wrote on Aug 11, 2009 2:29 PM:
Robert Stephens wrote on Aug 11, 2009 2:03 PM:
Factcheck is a reliable source, no doubt, but you have to dig a little deeper to the the entire picture. "
Bruce wrote on Aug 11, 2009 9:49 AM:
How much would you bet she has not read the bill? No wonder she can not talk intelligently about it. It was reported that Jeff Flake, a congressman from the Valley held a town hall in the Valley last night. They had space for 1500 at an auditorium and it was so packed that folks had to wait outside. Mr Flake stayed for hours to address all questions. The video showed there was some shouting. He did not shirk his responsibility. In fact, he apologized and went outside to talk to those who could not get in. He also said he would hold another. Compare that with Ann Kirkpatrick who is now in the Mideast at taxpayers expense. Look at her website if you dont believe it! "
Greg wrote on Aug 11, 2009 7:21 AM:
Excuse me but I know for a fact that people were not shouting and chanting and making discussion impossible at Ann Kirkpatrick's meeting!!! Kirkpatrick DID NOT want to answer questions. Please quit spewing lies Arizona Daily Sun. "
Elisha Dorfsmith wrote on Aug 11, 2009 7:08 AM:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLjcmKMUwEc "
Jeff Johnson wrote on Aug 11, 2009 6:56 AM:
Matthew Quigley wrote on Aug 11, 2009 5:50 AM:
A large crowd of folks showed up at Flagstaff’s health care forum. The structure of the forum was carefully thought out, obviously designed to avoid meaningful interaction between government representatives and their constituency. The forum featured an “all Democrat” panel who presented a Democratic perspective of proposed health care plans. Panel members showed little interest in the concerns of the small number of citizens who were actually permitted to speak. The attitude of the panel members clearly illustrated why folks across the nation have become so frustrated with government representatives. Over 200 folks were in attendance. Many of them wanted to share their concerns. No real opportunity for a fair and balanced presentation of opinions. It was a shameful display of the elitist attitude that is so prevalent in today’s political environment. The Daily Sun’s description of the Flagstaff health forum was pathetic. Those on the left can't understand that someone other than their ilk has a right to express their opinion in a public display and demand explanations.
The American people already know that Obama's plan to lower health costs while expanding coverage and bureaucracy is a myth. Just read from Obama’s own congressional budget office cost estimates. That’s why so many folks took the time to show up. If there truly is a need for health care reform, it should be done with the medical profession, the pharmaceutical industry, the insurance industry, and government legislators/regulators sitting at the table hammering out a viable solution acceptable to all the people, not just Barack Obama. We have an administration that is out of control, operating in the red, spending trillions of taxpayer dollars. The economy will never be able to support this massive national health care plan. Who's going to train the hundreds of new doctors and nurses that will be needed to support this scheme?
Every Senator and Congressman – all of them – before we even discuss healthcare reform, should, first have their own “skin in the game”. These guys have no skin in this game, not even a tiny chunk. Republicans offered a resolution, an opportunity to lead by example, an opportunity to enroll themselves in the same public plan. The resolution has over 40 co-sponsors. Not a single one is a Democrat. Politicians are eager to vote in favor of ObamaCare, but demonstrate a complete lack of confidence when asked to participate in the program. The Congress and Senate have a wonderful health care plan. It’s a private insurance plan, not a government run plan. Why can’t every American have their plan? What more does it take for Americans to understand what’s going on here? It was never about health care, it’s about control.
ObamaCare basically means that every time you are sick or injured, a regulatory agency of the Federal Government will tell your doctor what he can and cannot do for you. I wonder how the elderly folks in this country will react when they’re denied hip replacement surgery because of their age but illegal immigrants are given the medical treatment that they need? How can we add an additional 30 million people into our health care system without adding additional doctors and nurses to care for them? It’s simple; health care will be rationed and strictly controlled by the government. It’s the liberal answer – “let the government take care of us”.
Before any clear thinking American purchases an insurance policy, they certainly want to know what the deductible costs will be, which prescriptions are covered, and what criteria is used to determine if they are eligible for specific treatments or not. But those who support ObamaCare are like sheep, following along, without a clue of what this program is really about.
The liberal media criticizes those who’ve taken the time to read and understand this legislation. Ordinary folks have come out of the wood work in opposition to ObamaCare. Democrats have shamefully attempted to deflect attention from the real issues by demonizing those who express strong opposition to the fundamental flaws contained in the legislation. This legislation, if passed, will change our country forever. If Americans were ever entitled to express their opinion, this is certainly the time. This is still America. We still have a constitution.
When Obama was in pre-election campaign mode, he made some reasonable statements about healthcare. He told us we could keep our insurance if we were happy with it. He told us that government-run healthcare with higher taxes was a bad idea. He didn't think anyone should be forced to purchase health insurance. All of those campaign promises were lies. Only naive liberals believed him. If the plan is implemented, the word democrat will become a curse word, and the words liberal and progressive will make folks gag. At least some good will result from this. "
All comments will be reviewed before being posted. Comments that contain profanity or are obscene, resort to name calling, are libelous in nature, or make personal attacks won’t be approved. Criticism should focus on the ideas or arguments presented — not the person.
Comments are not always reviewed immediately, especially when posted on weekends or nights.
We reserve the right to delete any comments that, upon further review, fail to meet our guidelines.
Do we edit user comments? No. The writers are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide.
Click to see the complete policy
News Photos Slide Show
The Arizona Daily Sun, Copyright 2009 © 1751 S. Thompson, Flagstaff, AZ


HotCoffee wrote on Aug 13, 2009 4:25 PM:
Or maybe you're complaining about the fact I didn't address your lists of liberal groups that you posted. Excuse me, but I posted the list first. None of you addressed it beyond the typical "Yeah, so?" Therefore, why do you merit me answering you? Quid pro quo, JustMe, quid pro quo. "